Contact form

Your request has been sent.

Please enter your name

Please enter your email

Please enter a correct email address

Please enter your company name

Please enter your message

Name*

Email*

Company*

Contact goal

Subject

Message*

Information marked with an asterisk is essential to process your request and is intended for PRELIGENS and its subcontractors. The other fields are optional and enable PRELIGENS to customise its communications.
Your personal data are used by PRELIGENS to send any electronic communications you have agreed to.
The data collected are stored for the period necessary to process your request and for a maximum period of three (3) years from the last communication for marketing purposes.
You have a right of access, rectification, erasure, and withdrawal of your consent at any time, and to object, without reason, to the use of your data for marketing purposes. You can exercise these rights by contacting us by email at [email protected].
For further information, or if you consider your rights are not respected, you can contact the control authority (CNIL) directly: https://www.cnil.fr/.

Preligens sponsor of FedGIS 2021

← All resources

Events

02/23/2021 by Preligens

Panel: Maximizing National Security Investments in AI

As long-time partners of Esri’s, we proudly supported the FedGIS 2021 conference.

Mark Knapp discussed with top-speakers — Patrick Biltgen (Booz Allen Hamilton), Brady Cline (Esri), and Dr. Grant Scott (University of Missouri-Columbia) — on the integration of AI/ML technologies across the national security enterprise.

The panelists discussed key topics:

❓How can defense and intelligence organizations prepare their workforces for AI?

❓What are the best practices for transitioning AI capabilities developed in academic or industry labs to national security organizations?

❓With earth observation (#EO) already a focus area, which other national security functions could be good candidates for AI?

❓How can government customers best take advantage of commercial investments in AI capabilities?

❗Emphasize on the need for “explainable AI” to speed adoption of AI workflows at national security organizations.

❗Highlight on the disparity between humans and machines when considering decision points during assessments, with humans averaging 7-11 decision points compared to machines using 1000s.

❓How could national security organizations use socio-technologists for determining what workflows are most appropriate for AI applications?